More than 170,000 current students and graduates across the United Kingdom have begun legal moves against 36 universities, alleging that they were denied the full educational experience they paid for during the Covid-19 pandemic. The students argue that the widespread shift from traditional in-person teaching to online learning significantly reduced the quality and value of their university education, despite tuition fees remaining unchanged.
The legal action follows a confidential settlement reached between University College London and a student claim group representing thousands of affected individuals. Although the university did not admit wrongdoing, the settlement has encouraged many more students from other institutions to pursue similar claims, paving the way for one of the largest coordinated legal challenges ever faced by the UK higher education sector.
Lawyers representing the students have already issued formal pre-action notices to the 36 universities, notifying them of the intention to seek compensation. These claims are expected to focus primarily on the difference in value between in-person education, which includes direct interaction with lecturers, access to facilities, and hands-on learning, and the online alternative that was introduced during lockdown periods. Students argue that they paid full tuition fees on the expectation of receiving comprehensive, campus-based academic services, which were not fully delivered.
During the height of the pandemic, universities across the country were forced to suspend face-to-face teaching in compliance with public health restrictions. Lectures, tutorials, and assessments were moved online, while access to libraries, laboratories, studios, and other academic facilities was severely limited or completely unavailable for extended periods. Many students were confined to their homes or student accommodations, often studying remotely under challenging conditions.
The impact was particularly severe for students enrolled in courses that depend heavily on practical training and specialized equipment. Programmes such as fine arts, engineering, laboratory sciences, performing arts, and design were among the most affected, as students were unable to fully engage in hands-on learning. In addition, networking opportunities, internships, and other career-development experiences were either reduced or cancelled entirely.
Graduation ceremonies and other milestone events were also disrupted. Many ceremonies were held virtually, postponed, or significantly scaled down, depriving students of traditional academic celebrations. For graduates entering the workforce, the pandemic created additional uncertainty, with fewer job opportunities and reduced employer engagement.
Legal representatives for the students argue that universities failed to deliver the services promised when students enrolled and paid their fees. They maintain that the shift to online learning, while necessary under emergency conditions, resulted in a diminished educational experience that did not reflect the cost of tuition. They further claim that many students experienced frustration, emotional distress, and disappointment as a result of these changes.
An economic assessment is expected to form a central part of the legal arguments, with experts examining the financial difference between online and in-person education. Students are expected to seek partial refunds or compensation to reflect what they describe as lost academic value and reduced access to essential learning resources.
On the other hand, universities and their representative body, Universities UK, have defended the actions taken during the pandemic. They argue that institutions responded rapidly to an unprecedented global crisis and worked hard to ensure students could continue their education despite extraordinary circumstances. According to university leaders, the transition to online learning was carried out to protect public health while maintaining academic continuity.
University officials also emphasize that the pandemic created conditions beyond their control, as government restrictions prevented normal campus operations. They insist that staff adapted quickly, developing new teaching methods, digital platforms, and support systems to help students complete their degrees.
The legal claims relate primarily to academic sessions between 2019 and 2022, although some courses continued to experience disruptions into 2023. The deadline for filing Covid-related claims is set for September 2026, giving affected students limited time to pursue legal remedies.
The universities named in the claims include several of the UK’s most prominent institutions, such as the University of Birmingham, University of Bristol, University of Leeds, University of Liverpool, University of Manchester, and Imperial College London, among others.
Legal experts believe the outcome of these cases could have far-reaching consequences for the higher education sector. If the claims are successful, universities may face significant financial liabilities and could be forced to reassess how tuition fees are structured during emergencies. The cases may also set new legal precedents regarding the contractual obligations of universities and the rights of students as paying consumers.
For many of the affected students, the legal action represents an effort to seek accountability and recognition for the academic and personal challenges they faced during one of the most disruptive periods in modern educational history.
Post comments (0)